Všechna hlášení
Hlášení 31
#127276: "Stalemate situation "
implemented: Tento návrh byl implementován
1
Čeho se toto hlášení týká?
Co se stalo? Prosím vyberte níže
Podnět: podle mého názoru by následující významně vylepšilo hru
Detailní popis
-
• Prosím popiš svůj návrh přesně a konzistentně, aby bylo snadné pochopit, co máš na mysli.
It would be nice if there was a way to resolve stalemates.
For example in my last game I attempted to pass, the opposing player swapped 8h with 7h
Pass
Swap 7h with 8h
Pass
Swap 8h with 7h
Ect.
Not sure what the resolution would be. • Jaký prohlížeč používáte?
Google Chrome v125
Historie hlášení
13. Jun 2024 20:18 • ufm • Vývojáři si myslí, že to není dobrý nápad nebo poměr cena/výhody je příliš vysoký:
You have to close the round to get out of the loop.
26. Jun 2024 00:44 • Zeus • Vývojáři si myslí, že to není dobrý nápad nebo poměr cena/výhody je příliš vysoký:
no it's a very specific scenario where somebody intentionally shuffles to not pass along, and would just grab the 3rd card if the other person closed the round. it can happen that neither player is incentivized to progress the game. would be nice to have a tie offer for these scenarios, they happen somewhat frequently at higher levels - look at this scenario in the round where i am 3-1 ahead: boardgamearena.com/table?table=524830611. i know they have 2 spades, so if i gave them the 8s, they would likely win, so i have to shuffle the hearts instead because passing along would allow them to gain an edge as they would be first to play. in games with a high level friend of mine, we just agree to a tie after a few shuffles, but there should be a better option.
in order for people to not endlessly shuffle anyway, an automatic end of the round if x number of exchanges happen with no progress should also be implemented / added as an optional setting.
in order for people to not endlessly shuffle anyway, an automatic end of the round if x number of exchanges happen with no progress should also be implemented / added as an optional setting.
26. Jun 2024 03:19 • ufm • Vývojáři si myslí, že to není dobrý nápad nebo poměr cena/výhody je příliš vysoký:
Closing the round has nothing to do with the next round's first player.
26. Jun 2024 03:30 • Zeus • Vývojáři si myslí, že to není dobrý nápad nebo poměr cena/výhody je příliš vysoký:
i am aware, what i said is in reference to me not being incentivized to pass along - when he passes, and i pass along, the 3 middle cards are exchanged and it would be his turn first and he so he can take the desired cards. thats why shuffling is the superior move - its a flaw in the game, because it is a stalemate where both players should not progress.
getting an anti-stalemate option would be big for that reason.
in most casual games, it doesn't matter and people will progress to not be annoying, but if played competitively / optimally, this will come up and needs a better solution.
getting an anti-stalemate option would be big for that reason.
in most casual games, it doesn't matter and people will progress to not be annoying, but if played competitively / optimally, this will come up and needs a better solution.
26. Jun 2024 03:38 • ufm • Vývojáři si myslí, že to není dobrý nápad nebo poměr cena/výhody je příliš vysoký:
Then close the round... Closing is not equivalent to passing.
26. Jun 2024 03:43 • Focus • Vývojáři si myslí, že to není dobrý nápad nebo poměr cena/výhody je příliš vysoký:
i agree that adding an option to agree to tie the round and/or blocking people from endlessly shuffling in order to block a pass would improve the game
26. Jun 2024 03:52 • Zeus • Vývojáři si myslí, že to není dobrý nápad nebo poměr cena/výhody je příliš vysoký:
nobody can close profitably there - if you check the scenario from the replay, NnSshared became annoyed and closed, and I then exchanged and won the round.
if played optimally (and he knew that too), he had to continue passing there, and I had to continue shuffling, because I don't have enough to close and win (knowing he has at least 17), and if I did exchange the 8 of Spades, then he could take it and would likely win.
his best move: passing
my best move: shuffling 2 cards
this should be repeated endlessly with optimal play. closing is not an option that either of us can take if we wanted to win. it's an option that progresses the game, but it doesn't favor either player. with good players this happens fairly often and is unavoidable.
Adding a "tie offer" would be great and something most honorable players would want - and an extra optional setting to protect yourself against people potentially abusing it "round automatically closes after 20 moves without progress" would be great.
People could virtually just sit there and shuffle cards, and wait for the other person to get bored / give up. I've had similar scenarios with many players, where nothing but the same exchanges were done for 10 minutes and draw offers via chat were ignored.
if played optimally (and he knew that too), he had to continue passing there, and I had to continue shuffling, because I don't have enough to close and win (knowing he has at least 17), and if I did exchange the 8 of Spades, then he could take it and would likely win.
his best move: passing
my best move: shuffling 2 cards
this should be repeated endlessly with optimal play. closing is not an option that either of us can take if we wanted to win. it's an option that progresses the game, but it doesn't favor either player. with good players this happens fairly often and is unavoidable.
Adding a "tie offer" would be great and something most honorable players would want - and an extra optional setting to protect yourself against people potentially abusing it "round automatically closes after 20 moves without progress" would be great.
People could virtually just sit there and shuffle cards, and wait for the other person to get bored / give up. I've had similar scenarios with many players, where nothing but the same exchanges were done for 10 minutes and draw offers via chat were ignored.
26. Jun 2024 04:27 • ufm • Tento návrh byl implementován:
Ok, added automatic closure rule.
If the round does not end after surviving player count x 10 moves after the last card draw (either by round start or fresh draw after all players pass), the round instantly ends.
If the round does not end after surviving player count x 10 moves after the last card draw (either by round start or fresh draw after all players pass), the round instantly ends.
Doplňte tuto zprávu
Prosím přidej sem cokoli, co by mohlo být relevantní pro reprodukci této chyby nebo pochopení tvého návrhu:
- ID dalšího stolu / ID tahu
- Byla chyba odstraněna stisknutím F5?
- Objevila se tato chyba častěji? Pokaždé? Náhodně?
- Pokud máš snímek obrazvky zobrazující tuto chybu (doporučujeme!), můžeš použít Imgur.com pro nahrání obrázku a pak odkaz na tento obrázek na Imguru zkopírovat a vložit sem.
