Všechna hlášení
Hlášení Archa Nova
#88026: "Pilfer 2 took from one player twice instead of two"
notabug: Toto není bug
2
Čeho se toto hlášení týká?
Co se stalo? Prosím vyberte níže
Pravidla: pravidla hry nebyla dodržena
Detailní popis
-
• Která část pravidel nebyla dodržena adaptací hry na BGA
It should have taken once from the player with the highest Appeal, and once from the player with highest Conservation. It took twice from the player with highest Conservation.
-
• Je vidět porušení pravidel na záznamu hry? Pokud ano, ve kterém tahu?
Move 610
• Jaký prohlížeč používáte?
Google Chrome v113
Historie hlášení
6. May 2023 17:32 • GTSchemer • Toto není bug:
Greetings, did you check whether the opponent had Quarantine Lab, making them immune?
6. May 2023 20:39 • runtly • Toto není bug:
They do, but it still should not have taken from the player who had the most conservation twice. The person playing the card had the 2nd most appeal, so there should not have been a target for the 2nd pilfer.
6. May 2023 22:17 • GTSchemer • Vývojáři požadují další informace k reprodukování chyby:
@runtly did you choose to gain appeal before or after executing the Pilfer effect?
We cannot reveal the full log to check until the game is done.
We cannot reveal the full log to check until the game is done.
6. May 2023 23:42 • runtly • Vývojáři požadují další informace k reprodukování chyby:
It wasn't me that played it, but from the images I posted on imgur it looks like no, appeal was not gained until after pilfer was played. I can't see the rest of the history right now, so it may have been that Percephony was lower before the card was played. Probably in that case, it wouldn't have been a bug. Thanks for taking the time to look into this.
7. May 2023 00:18 • GTSchemer • Vývojáři požadují další informace k reprodukování chyby:
Right, that's what I have to figure out.
14. May 2023 16:22 • GTSchemer • Vývojáři požadují další informace k reprodukování chyby:
We are reviewing the replay now.
22. May 2023 21:48 • Tisaac • Toto není bug:
At the moment of Pilfering, Percephony had 7 conservation and 38 appeal.
Daylighter had 7 conservation, 40 appeal.
Duggo had 5 an 51 with Quarantine lab.
Runtly had 5 and 37.
Everything seems good here.
Daylighter had 7 conservation, 40 appeal.
Duggo had 5 an 51 with Quarantine lab.
Runtly had 5 and 37.
Everything seems good here.
22. May 2023 22:33 • GTSchemer • Toto není bug:
It seems the replay didn't necessarily show correct values for some counters, but the math adds up.
Doplňte tuto zprávu
Prosím přidej sem cokoli, co by mohlo být relevantní pro reprodukci této chyby nebo pochopení tvého návrhu:
- ID dalšího stolu / ID tahu
- Byla chyba odstraněna stisknutím F5?
- Objevila se tato chyba častěji? Pokaždé? Náhodně?
- Pokud máš snímek obrazvky zobrazující tuto chybu (doporučujeme!), můžeš použít Imgur.com pro nahrání obrázku a pak odkaz na tento obrázek na Imguru zkopírovat a vložit sem.

